The Organizational Health Assessment is designed to help reduce turnover costs, improve productivity and eliminate negative perceptions from existing and potential clients and customers when the company loses a key employee.

How to get started >>

Within 6 Weeks, We Can:

1. Assess your organizational health
• Perform 1:1 confidential interviews inclusive of all staff levels
• Prepare and administer culture assessment and employee attitude surveys
• Conduct focus groups
2. Provide findings and recommended strategies
3. Prepare communications proposal that can be implemented by:
   • Millerwood Communications
   • Your organization
4. If necessary, provide resources with expertise in other specific areas to address additional issues

Increase Morale-Improve Bottom Line

Reduce Turnover Costs

• Management spends billable and/or valuable time reading resumes and interviewing
• New employees spend time training and ramping up
• Clients and customers HATE IT!

Improve Productivity (“happy people are productive people”) so employees:

• Demonstrate increased loyalty
• Take less time off

Eliminate negative perceptions that create:

• Concern/suspicion to existing and potential clients and customers
• Unease among employees

Why Act Now?

FUTURE LACK OF SKILLED EMPLOYEES TOP HR CONCERN
“HR Professionals rank concern for an upcoming potential labor or skills shortage as one of their most critical concerns.”
Society of Human Resource Management
2004-2005 Workplace Forecast: A Strategic Outlook

GROWING NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES SEEKING NEW JOBS
“93 percent of Americans plan to look for a new job in the New Year [2005].”
Monster Meter Poll, December, 2004

HIGH COST OF LOSING EMPLOYEES
“By retaining, rather than losing one key employee, the organization saves two to three times the salary of that person and retains the knowledge and abilities of a seasoned worker.”
Society for Human Resource Management, November, 2001

COMMUNICATIONS DECREASES TURNOVER
“Turnover rates in organizations that communicate most effectively are 50% below those of less-effective communicators.”
Watson Wyatt Worldwide 2003/2004 Communication Study^TM